|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47680] classdef @ operator to overrided superclass methods |
Date: | Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:22:17 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 |
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #47680 (project octave): Why would "this" be interpreted as a function name in this context? Do you mean as a "command-style" function? What if you write x = this . addRequired @ inputParser (name, validator); ? It shouldn't be possible for it to be recognized as command syntax on the RHS of an assignment operator. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47680> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |