[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RC1 Candidate (windows 64, msvcr100.dll)
From: |
JohnD |
Subject: |
Re: RC1 Candidate (windows 64, msvcr100.dll) |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:03:48 -0500 |
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:17:26 -0500
> From: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
> To: Markus M?tzel <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, Octave-Maintainers
> <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: RC1 Candidate (windows 64, msvcr100.dll)
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 1/29/19 10:05 AM, "Markus M?tzel" wrote:
>
> >> We are building icu with GCC so I don't know why it depends on a
> >> particular version of the msvc runtime library.
> >
> > That's probably because we pass "CXXFLAGS='--std=gnu++0x' LIBS=-
> lmsvcr100" to configure in icu4c.mk.
>
> Oh, I didn't know. John D Might know why that was done.
>
> > Can we omit setting these variables?
>
> I'll try to build without those options.
>
> jwe
>
>
I think I borrowed heavily from mxe.cc for the file, so it might have come
from there. I see on their current file, it doesnt have the libs def but
still has the compiler flag.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: RC1 Candidate (windows 64, msvcr100.dll),
JohnD <=