Re: catch_block of eval

[John W. Eaton]

On 1/30/19 11:13 AM, Rik wrote:
> > My question about what to do for
> >
> >   eval (try_code, catch_code)
> >
> > remains.  Does anyone have comments about that?  If not, I can open a 
> > bug report so that the issue is not forgotten.
> >
> > jwe
>
> Unless it is a problem, I would be inclined to keep it.  It is kind of a 
> handy feature, and Octave does like to think of itself as a superset of 
> Matlab.  We can certainly handle the one-input form, but why not handle 
> a two-input form?

OK, it seems fine to keep it unless I find a more important reason than 
"it makes the implementation simpler".

jwe