[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boosting tolerances on gammainc BIST tests
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: boosting tolerances on gammainc BIST tests |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:24:50 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:46:25 -0800, Rik wrote:
> @Mike: No objection from me to relaxing the tolerances if the miss is only
> a further few eps. If it is larger, maybe 10 eps, then it probably
> deserves a closer look.
The gammainc.m test failures on Christian's system
() 0.4906 0.4906 Rel err 1.1315e-15 exceeds tol
1.1102e-15 by 2e-17
() 17.3984 17.3984 Rel err 6.1259e-16 exceeds tol
4.4409e-16 by 2e-16
() 18.0654 18.0654 Rel err 1.5733e-15 exceeds tol
1.5543e-15 by 2e-17
are from these three tests
%!assert (gammainc (200, 200, "upper"), 0.49059658199276367497217454, -5*eps)
%!assert (gammainc(1000, 1000.5, "scaledlower"), 39.48467539583672271, -2*eps)
%!assert (gammainc (200, 200, "scaledlower"), 18.065406676779221643065, -7*eps)
and look like they will all be fixed by increasing by 1 eps, I'll make
that change on stable soon.
> If you switch back to OpenBLAS from FlexiBLAS do the errors go away?
It should be a pass through, I used the same combination of FlexiBLAS
2.0.0 and OpenBLAS 0.3.5 and was not able to reproduce any of the fails.
--
mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature