[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build a portable linux binary?
From: |
roland65 |
Subject: |
Re: Build a portable linux binary? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:02:24 -0600 (CST) |
John W. Eaton wrote
> Also, the point of mxe-octave was initially to build Octave for Windows.
> Using it to build for Linux systems was something that happened later,
> and only because I needed a way to build Octave and all dependencies on
> systems like RHEL 5 that didn't have compilers that were new enough to
> build Octave and that also lacked the necessary dependencies as
> packages.
I understand the point. However, the Scilab team probably has the same
problems but they distribute a common binary for all Linux distributions
(it's only a tar.gz archive and there is no need to be root for running
Scilab). I think they also have many dependencies like Octave...
Perhaps, it could be interesting to know how they do?
--
Sent from: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Maintainers-f1638794.html
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, (continued)
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, CROZIER Richard, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, roland65, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, CROZIER Richard, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, John W. Eaton, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?, Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/02/19
- Re: Build a portable linux binary?,
roland65 <=
Re: Build a portable linux binary?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2019/02/23