[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Om-synth] "note allocation scheme" with polyphony = 1
From: |
Atte André Jensen |
Subject: |
Re: [Om-synth] "note allocation scheme" with polyphony = 1 |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:47:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) |
Dave Robillard wrote:
> I don't know about the four different ways.. that would require a
> control port to select which method is used, but there's no real way
> of having enumerations so you can tell which method you're actually
> using (it'd just be some meaningless number).
Can't you put names to vaues in om internal modules?
> I suppose I could make it voodoo, ie a 'configuration' thing, not part
> of a node. I guess a configuration system of some variety is due one
> of these days, come to think of it.
It would make sense, anyways, right?
> Anyway, /for the time being/, I'll just fix it to be latest note
> (which I think is best),
That would be the best, agreed
> or maybe a slightly more clever tweak thereof (ie never steal the
> lowest note, which is always a good trick).
That's not so good. It would be the same as higest nte priority...
> I'll take a look into all the voice allocation stuff as soon as I get
> back to my computer and can actually run Om.
Great, great, great...
--
.''`. Peace, love & harmony
: :' : Atte
`. `'
`- http://www.atte.dk