[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fwd: Fw: [Openvds-devel] VDS Apache Features - Request for Comment]
From: |
Damion Parry |
Subject: |
[Fwd: Fw: [Openvds-devel] VDS Apache Features - Request for Comment] |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:23:07 +0000 |
Hello,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eje Gustafsson" <address@hidden>
> To: "rick oneil" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Openvds-devel] VDS Apache Features - Request for Comment
>
> > embedded
> >
> > Tuesday, December 11, 2001, 06:34:18 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > ro> OK, up late tonite and got development issues...
> >
> > ro> In the NEW openVDS, there are several issues that customers will
> expect.
> >
> > ro> Most customers are *used* to certian ways that apache works. When
> they get
> > ro> this *new* technology, most will probably want the following:
> >
> > ro> 1.) ip based domains
> > ro> 2.) name based domains.
> >
> > ro> Also, the best thing about a VDS is the ability for the customer to
> handle
> > ro> thier dns administration. I want hands off of that. I've been doing
> dns
> > ro> entries for about 7 years now and sick of it.
> >
> > ro> SO, correct me if I'm wrong, but right now an openVDS (or freevsd
> 1.4.x)
> > ro> virtual dedicated server instance looks to me like it only can have
> one IP
> > ro> address ??
> >
> > ro> Is this the case? In the latest skel for redhat 6.2 from the
> ftp.freevsd.org
> > ro> site, there is no /etc/sysconfig/ folder.
> >
> > ro> Is anyone putting multiple ip's on the VDS? If so, how?
> >
> > The way FreeVSD is designed it's only meant to have 1 ip per virtual
> > server which means you only can run 1 IP based domain per VS then you
> > will have to do name based if you want more then 1.
Have you tried :
> vsdadm vs_addipalias localhost
syntax: vs_addipalias <host svr> <vs>
<ipaddr>
- [Fwd: Fw: [Openvds-devel] VDS Apache Features - Request for Comment],
Damion Parry <=