[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 01:47:05 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
Travis posted on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:29:58 -0800 as excerpted:
> I listen to all those that post here Duncan included even though it
> sometimes reminds me of
> what I might hear at a rightwing "Fundamentalist" revival.
FWIW, something that sometimes gets lost on both Christian (I honestly
don't know if it applies in Islam, etc, or not) and Linux/FLOSS
fundamentalists, but which I'm acutely aware of, due to my background, is
that it *MUST* be a personal choice.
For Christians (at least most Christians, and here's why I'm not sure it
applies to Islam, etc), it's called "salvation by faith". If it's the
law, it's not faith. I know. I grew up in a rather fundamentalist
denomination, and while my folks were more or less OK, they sent me to
church boarding high school, where spiritual choices were basically
forced. That rather seriously screwed up my life in ways that it took
/years/ to recover from. While now I accept that I'd be a rather
different person than I am now had things been otherwise, and have thus
come to accept what happened and have learned to live with it as a part of
what makes me, /me/, that doesn't change the fact that forcing such things
was and is morally wrong, period, and that I've have probably been far
better off (and would have likely turned out far closer to my parents
wishes, spiritually), had I gone to public school where I had to exercise
my "spiritual choice muscles" every day, instead of having it forced on me.
Similarly with Linux, but in a positive direction. It took me two years
of preparation after the evidence was that I'd end up on Linux, before I
finally was ready to make the jump (and then, as I've said, it was due to
a push from MS). It happened in its own time. Had someone from the Linux
side been able to or tried to force me before that, it'd have had only
negative results, rather like the push MS gave me ultimately had negative
results for them and the forced choices that church school made for me had
negative results for both me and them.
Indeed, one of my Linux "mentors" told me later that he despaired of my
ever making the leap and decided that I'd be on MS the rest of my life.
But fortunately, he didn't try to force the issue (possibly because there
wasn't much he could do /to/ force it, as it was only thru a newsgroup
that I knew him, but regardless...), only continued to patiently attempt
to persuade... continuing to make the arguments after he was convinced it
was a lost cause.
It was precisely because of that, because after having presented their
case, I was allowed to make the decision right for me when it /was/ right
for me, that I ended up the extremely strong supporter of freedomware and
the freedom it means, today.
So while I'm both a strong Christian with personally "fundamentalist"
beliefs and a strong Linux/FLOSS zealot, with similarly strong beliefs,
I'm JUST as equally strong a supporter of individual freedom and the right
to choose. Indeed, /because/ of those extremely strong belief including an
appreciation for what I see as the results of one's choice, and /because/
of my experience, I *MUST* be a strong supporter of personal freedom,
because the stakes are simply too high to attempt to short-circuit things!
So rest assured, Travis (and anyone else reading), that I respect your
choice and the vital importance of you having that choice both now and
continuing to have it in the future, to an extent far far greater than I
could ever believe that you've made what, from my personal perspective,
might look like the wrong one!
Just because I have beliefs strong enough that I believe I should be
willing to support those beliefs to death, doesn't mean I'm interested in
forcing those beliefs on others. Quite the contrary, in fact. I happen
to know folks that wish a fire (or earthquake, or...) would destroy the
local mosque and it distresses me greatly. Similarly, I know folks that
would likely as not be joining the pro-life forces demonstrating at an
abortion clinic. But should I be aware of said demonstration, I'd very
likely be on the other side, marching for pro-choice, even if I personally
believe abortion is wrong. Indeed, I've contemplated volunteering as a
guard at Planned Parenthood, a chapter of which we have locally, tho I
haven't in part because I've /not/ seen a particular need for it.
Similarly, I could easily see myself at a city council hearing, opposing a
move to shut down the local strip club, even if it'd be against my
personal beliefs to attend such an establishment.
For similar reasons, I really do hope MS stays around for awhile, to I'd
certainly be happy to see them with a 5-10 percent share instead of the 90-
plus they enjoyed at one point. And, I sincerely hope for an ultimate
browser plurality, maximum perhaps 40% share for a single browser, even
were that browser to be say firefox, and similarly for the OS market -- I
really do /not/ wish for Linux majority share, tho plurality would be
nice, and I'd take majority Linux, or majority FreeBSD, or /anything/
freedomware, over majority MS or Apple, any day.
[Meta observation: My! Look where this topic has gone! But oh, well, it's
not as if we have a pressing new release of pan and a bunch of unanswered
questions about it to deal with... And pan being GPL2, it could be argued
that it's not /entirely/ OT.]
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/06
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, walt, 2010/03/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Travis, 2010/03/07
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?,
Duncan <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, walt, 2010/03/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/07
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/09
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/09