[Pika-dev] Pika Plans? [was: My hours]

[Andreas Rottmann]

Thomas Lord <address@hidden> writes:

> FYI:
>
> Things on my end are shaking out now so that, in contrast to recent
> months, I am rapidly approaching a point at which I can spend a 
> fairly deterministic number of hours per week on arch.
>
I take this mail as an occasion to ask about your short/medium-term
Pika plans; unfortunatly development has been stalled since June, when
you came up with Furth (and later XL). From your recent mails ([0],
[1]), I conclude that getting XL up and running is a prerequiste for
the Pika evaluator. As the xl category in your archive hasn't seen new
changesets in a while, I wonder if there is anything we (Pika devels)
can do to help getting XL up, assuming this will help Pika progress.

[0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pika-dev/2004-09/msg00010.html
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pika-dev/2004-07/msg00002.html

Thanks, Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise.