[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Protux-devel] CVS compilable?
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
[Protux-devel] CVS compilable? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:23:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
Hi,
I tried to compile protux and mustux, mustux went fine but protux generates a
lot of compile errors.
MTA.xx is producing a lot of errors due missing includes and non declared
functions. Are you still working on these classes Luciano?
Else I can maybe do some work on it tomorrow to make it compilable again.
Also have a question about the includes. I noticed you both add the
class CLASS_NAME in a .hh file and
include "CLASS_NAME.hh" in the .cc of the same class.
Can you please explain what it is good for? Thanks a lot.
Greetings,
Remon
- Re: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, (continued)
- Re: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Martin Herren, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Martin Herren, 2004/02/12
- Re: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Luciano Giordana, 2004/02/12
- MustuxAudioFileFormat Was: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Martin Herren, 2004/02/14
- Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat Was: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Martin Herren, 2004/02/23
- Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat Was: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Luciano Giordana, 2004/02/23
- Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat Was: [Protux-devel] ugly click on wav output, Luciano Giordana, 2004/02/23
- [Protux-devel] Still alive ;-), Remon Sijrier, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Protux-devel] Still alive ;-), Luciano Giordana, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Protux-devel] Still alive ;-), Remon Sijrier, 2004/02/25
- [Protux-devel] CVS compilable?,
Remon Sijrier <=
- Re: [Protux-devel] CVS compilable?, Luciano Giordana, 2004/02/27