[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch)
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
OK, how about this then:
- The "master" branch we are currently using remains the
primary development branch. Anything that introduces a
new feature is committed to this branch.
- We create a new branch, tentatively named "stable", and
initially branched away from where "master" is now.
Anything that fixes a bug is committed to this branch.
- Periodically, as necessary, we merge the stable branch
into the master branch, so that the master branch also
receives bug fixes.
Comments?
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, John Darrington, 2008/08/11
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/11
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, John Darrington, 2008/08/28
- Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/29
- branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch),
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch), Jason Stover, 2008/08/30
- Re: branch proposal (was: Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch), John Darrington, 2008/08/30
- Re: branch proposal, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/31
- Re: branch proposal, John Darrington, 2008/08/31