[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:57:25 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
I uploaded the new version. Thank you!
bojo42 <address@hidden> writes:
> As PSPP finally migrated to testing in Debian now, i uploaded the new
> version to mentors. Please push it Ben.
>
> Cheers
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 10:15 +0100 schrieb bojo42:
>> John's fix works:
>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/97611171/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120319-0ubuntu1~bojo1~precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Am Sonntag, den 18.03.2012, 14:29 -0700 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>> > I haven't done anything to address that one yet, and I don't
>> > think that John has either.
>> >
>> > bojo42 <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> > > I let it rebuild for precise with current Git and while the 180 & 181
>> > > are fixed just fine, there still is an error with the 439 test:
>> > >
>> > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/97273119/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120318-0ubuntu1~bojo1~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2012, 22:15 -0700 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>> > >> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
>> > >>
>> > >> > John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> 180 and 181 both relate to reading of openoffice.org
>> > >> >> spreadsheet files and seem to be just warnings. I wonder why
>> > >> >> the problem didn't show up on debian? Maybe a different libxml
>> > >> >> library? Since this xml is generated by openoffice itself,
>> > >> >> there's probably not much we can do if libxml thinks it is
>> > >> >> wrong. Perhaps we should just change the test to ignore the
>> > >> >> warning.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Looking through my own builder's logs, I see at least three
>> > >> > failures of these tests on different days (Feb. 29 and March 2
>> > >> > and 3):
>> > >> >
>> > >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120229030501/testsuite.dir/
>> > >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120302030501/testsuite.dir/
>> > >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120303030503/testsuite.dir/
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Must be something nondeterministic at work.
>> > >>
>> > >> I found it with valgrind and fixed it with this commit:
>> >
>>
>>
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, (continued)
- Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Boris Heisel, 2012/03/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, John Darrington, 2012/03/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/14
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/15
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, John Darrington, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, Ben Pfaff, 2012/03/18
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/21
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders, bojo42, 2012/03/26
- Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders,
Ben Pfaff <=