qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 2/2] tests/microbit-test: add TWI stub device t


From: Julia Suvorova
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 2/2] tests/microbit-test: add TWI stub device test
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:11:05 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1



On 10.01.2019 12:48, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 2019-01-10 10:40, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
This test verifies that we read back the expected I2C WHO_AM_I register
values for the accelerometer/magnetometer.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
---
  tests/microbit-test.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/microbit-test.c b/tests/microbit-test.c
index 0c125535f6..dcdc0cd41a 100644
--- a/tests/microbit-test.c
+++ b/tests/microbit-test.c
@@ -21,6 +21,49 @@
  #include "hw/arm/nrf51.h"
  #include "hw/gpio/nrf51_gpio.h"
  #include "hw/timer/nrf51_timer.h"
+#include "hw/i2c/microbit_i2c.h"
+
+/* Read a byte from I2C device at @addr from register @reg */
+static uint32_t i2c_read_byte(uint32_t addr, uint32_t reg)
+{
+    uint32_t val;
+
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_REG_ADDRESS, addr);
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_TASK_STARTTX, 1);
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_REG_TXD, reg);
+    val = readl(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_EVENT_TXDSENT);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(val, ==, 1);
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_TASK_STOP, 1);
+
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_TASK_STARTRX, 1);
+    val = readl(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_EVENT_RXDREADY);
+    g_assert_cmpuint(val, ==, 1);
+    val = readl(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_REG_RXD);
+    writel(NRF51_TWI_BASE + NRF51_TWI_TASK_STOP, 1);

Any chance that you could use qemu_writel() right from the start here?
That will make it easier to finally get rid of global_qtest one day...

I'll send a patch soon to fix it.
But this test can be merged without corrections.

Best regards, Julia Suvorova.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]