qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] vfio-helpers: Free QEMUVFIOState in qemu_vfio_close()


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-helpers: Free QEMUVFIOState in qemu_vfio_close()
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:26:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

Hi Michal,

On 4/22/20 12:30 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The qemu_vfio_open_pci() allocates this QEMUVFIOState structure
but free counterpart is missing. Since we already have
qemu_vfio_close() which does cleanup of the state, it looks like
a perfect place to free the structure too. However, to avoid
confusing rename the function to make it explicit that the passed
structure is also freed.

==167296== 528 (360 direct, 168 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost 
in loss record 8,504 of 8,908
==167296==    at 0x4837B86: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:762)
==167296==    by 0x4B8F6A0: g_malloc0 (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.6000.7)
==167296==    by 0xA7F532: qemu_vfio_open_pci (vfio-helpers.c:428)
==167296==    by 0x989595: nvme_init (nvme.c:606)
==167296==    by 0x989EB0: nvme_file_open (nvme.c:795)
==167296==    by 0x8F9D04: bdrv_open_driver (block.c:1466)
==167296==    by 0x8FA6E1: bdrv_open_common (block.c:1744)
==167296==    by 0x8FDC73: bdrv_open_inherit (block.c:3291)
==167296==    by 0x8FE1B5: bdrv_open (block.c:3384)
==167296==    by 0x5EE828: bds_tree_init (blockdev.c:663)
==167296==    by 0x5F57F8: qmp_blockdev_add (blockdev.c:3746)
==167296==    by 0x5666DC: configure_blockdev (vl.c:1047)

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <address@hidden>
---
  block/nvme.c                | 2 +-
  include/qemu/vfio-helpers.h | 2 +-
  util/vfio-helpers.c         | 3 ++-
  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index 7b7c0cc5d6..7e00c4f1a7 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void nvme_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
                             false, NULL, NULL);
      event_notifier_cleanup(&s->irq_notifier);
      qemu_vfio_pci_unmap_bar(s->vfio, 0, (void *)s->regs, 0, NVME_BAR_SIZE);
-    qemu_vfio_close(s->vfio);
+    qemu_vfio_close_and_free(s->vfio);
g_free(s->device);
  }
diff --git a/include/qemu/vfio-helpers.h b/include/qemu/vfio-helpers.h
index 1f057c2b9e..c96a0b1963 100644
--- a/include/qemu/vfio-helpers.h
+++ b/include/qemu/vfio-helpers.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  typedef struct QEMUVFIOState QEMUVFIOState;
QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, Error **errp);
-void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s);
+void qemu_vfio_close_and_free(QEMUVFIOState *s);
  int qemu_vfio_dma_map(QEMUVFIOState *s, void *host, size_t size,
                        bool temporary, uint64_t *iova_list);
  int qemu_vfio_dma_reset_temporary(QEMUVFIOState *s);
diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
index ddd9a96e76..4c525d245b 100644
--- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
+++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void qemu_vfio_reset(QEMUVFIOState *s)
  }
/* Close and free the VFIO resources. */

The comment already says 'close and free', I don't think it is worth renaming the function.

-void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
+void qemu_vfio_close_and_free(QEMUVFIOState *s)
  {
      int i;
@@ -721,4 +721,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
      close(s->device);
      close(s->group);
      close(s->container);
+    g_free(s);

Good catch.

Preferably not renaming:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

  }





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]