qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] pcie: Specify 0 for ARI next function numbers


From: Ani Sinha
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] pcie: Specify 0 for ARI next function numbers
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:44:04 +0530


> On 10-Jul-2023, at 3:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 02:49:55PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10-Jul-2023, at 2:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 01:21:50PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 05-Jul-2023, at 7:54 AM, Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The current implementers of ARI are all SR-IOV devices. The ARI next
>>>>> function number field is undefined for VF according to PCI Express Base
>>>>> Specification Revision 5.0 Version 1.0 section 9.3.7.7. The PF should
>>>>> end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0 according to
>>>>> section 7.8.7.2.
>>>> 
>>>> Section 7.8.7.2 ARI Capability Register (Offset 04h), I see only this
>>>> 
>>>> Next Function Number - This field indicates the Function Number of the 
>>>> next higher numbered Function in the Device, or 00h if there are no higher 
>>>> numbered Functions. Function 0 starts this linked list of Functions.
>>>> 
>>>> I do not see anything specifically for PF. What am I missing?
>>> 
>>> This is *only* for PFs.
>> 
>> I think this covers both SRIOV and non SRIOV cases both. This is a
>> general case for all devices, PF or other non-SRIOV capable devices.
> 
> "this" being what?

“this” is the following line I quoted above:

"Next Function Number - This field indicates the Function Number of the next 
higher numbered Function in the Device, or 00h if there are no higher numbered 
Functions. Function 0 starts this linked list of Functions.”

I think it applies for all devices in general (except VFs).

> I'm talking about the pci spec text
> you quoted.
> 
> check out the sriov spec:
> Next Function Number – VFs are located using First
> VF Offset (see Section 3.3.9) and VF Stride (see
> Section 3.3.10).
> 
> 
> 
>>> There's separate text explaining that
>>> VFs use NumVFs VFOffset and VFStride.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> For migration, the field will keep having 1 as its value on the old
>>>>> virt models.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fixes: 2503461691 ("pcie: Add some SR/IOV API documentation in 
>>>>> docs/pcie_sriov.txt")
>>>>> Fixes: 44c2c09488 ("hw/nvme: Add support for SR-IOV")
>>>>> Fixes: 3a977deebe ("Intrdocue igb device emulation")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 2 ++
>>>>> hw/core/machine.c    | 1 +
>>>>> hw/pci/pci.c         | 2 ++
>>>>> hw/pci/pcie.c        | 2 +-
>>>>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
>>>>> index e6d0574a29..9c5b5eb206 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
>>>>> @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ enum {
>>>>>   QEMU_PCIE_CAP_CXL = (1 << QEMU_PCIE_CXL_BITNR),
>>>>> #define QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK_BITNR 11
>>>>>   QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK = (1 << QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK_BITNR),
>>>>> +#define QEMU_PCIE_ARI_NEXTFN_1_BITNR 12
>>>>> +    QEMU_PCIE_ARI_NEXTFN_1 = (1 << QEMU_PCIE_ARI_NEXTFN_1_BITNR),
>>>>> };
>>>>> 
>>>>> typedef struct PCIINTxRoute {
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
>>>>> index 46f8f9a2b0..f0d35c6401 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
>>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>>>>> 
>>>>> GlobalProperty hw_compat_8_0[] = {
>>>>>   { "migration", "multifd-flush-after-each-section", "on"},
>>>>> +    { TYPE_PCI_DEVICE, "x-pcie-ari-nextfn-1", "on" },
>>>>> };
>>>>> const size_t hw_compat_8_0_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_8_0);
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
>>>>> index e2eb4c3b4a..45a9bc0da8 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
>>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static Property pci_props[] = {
>>>>>   DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("acpi-index",  PCIDevice, acpi_index, 0),
>>>>>   DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-err-unc-mask", PCIDevice, cap_present,
>>>>>                   QEMU_PCIE_ERR_UNC_MASK_BITNR, true),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-ari-nextfn-1", PCIDevice, cap_present,
>>>>> +                    QEMU_PCIE_ARI_NEXTFN_1_BITNR, false),
>>>>>   DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
>>>>> };
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
>>>>> index 9a3f6430e8..cf09e03a10 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
>>>>> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ void pcie_sync_bridge_lnk(PCIDevice *bridge_dev)
>>>>> /* ARI */
>>>>> void pcie_ari_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset)
>>>>> {
>>>>> -    uint16_t nextfn = 1;
>>>>> +    uint16_t nextfn = dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCIE_ARI_NEXTFN_1 ? 1 : 0;
>>>>> 
>>>>>   pcie_add_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI, PCI_ARI_VER,
>>>>>                       offset, PCI_ARI_SIZEOF);
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.41.0
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]