qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme: avoid dynamic stack allocations


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme: avoid dynamic stack allocations
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:15:32 +0100

On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 08:09, Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk> wrote:
>
> On Aug 11 18:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The QEMU codebase has very few C variable length arrays, and if we can
> > get rid of them all we can make the compiler error on new additions.
> > This is a defensive measure against security bugs where an on-stack
> > dynamic allocation isn't correctly size-checked (e.g.  CVE-2021-3527).
> >
> > We last had a go at this a few years ago, when Philippe wrote
> > patches for this:
> > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210505211047.1496765-1-philmd@redhat.com/
> > Some of the fixes made it into the tree, but some didn't (either
> > because of lack of review or because review found some changes
> > that needed to be made). I'm going through the remainder as a
> > non-urgent Friday afternoon task...
> >
> > This patchset deals with two VLAs in the NVME code.
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
> >
> > Peter Maydell (1):
> >   hw/nvme: Avoid dynamic stack allocation
> >
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
> >   hw/nvme: Use #define to avoid variable length array
> >
> >  hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Thanks Peter,
>
> Applied to nvme-next!


Hi Klaus -- did these patches get lost? They don't seem to
have appeared in master yet.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]