qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH-for-9.0 04/10] hw/xen: Factor xen_arch_align_ioreq_data() out of


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: [PATCH-for-9.0 04/10] hw/xen: Factor xen_arch_align_ioreq_data() out of handle_ioreq()
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:21:07 +0100

Per commit f17068c1c7 ("xen-hvm: reorganize xen-hvm and move common
function to xen-hvm-common"), handle_ioreq() is expected to be
target-agnostic. However it uses 'target_ulong', which is a target
specific definition.

In order to compile this file once for all targets, factor the
target-specific code out of handle_ioreq() as a per-target handler
called xen_arch_align_ioreq_data().

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
Should we have a 'unsigned qemu_target_long_bits();' helper
such qemu_target_page_foo() API and target_words_bigendian()?
---
 include/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.h | 1 +
 hw/arm/xen_arm.c                | 8 ++++++++
 hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c           | 8 ++++++++
 hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c         | 5 +----
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.h b/include/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.h
index 27e938d268..734bfa3183 100644
--- a/include/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.h
+++ b/include/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.h
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ void xen_register_ioreq(XenIOState *state, unsigned int 
max_cpus,
 
 void cpu_ioreq_pio(ioreq_t *req);
 
+void xen_arch_align_ioreq_data(ioreq_t *req);
 void xen_arch_handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req);
 void xen_arch_set_memory(XenIOState *state,
                          MemoryRegionSection *section,
diff --git a/hw/arm/xen_arm.c b/hw/arm/xen_arm.c
index 6a1d7719e9..c646fd70d0 100644
--- a/hw/arm/xen_arm.c
+++ b/hw/arm/xen_arm.c
@@ -128,6 +128,14 @@ static void xen_init_ram(MachineState *machine)
     }
 }
 
+void xen_arch_align_ioreq_data(ioreq_t *req)
+{
+    if (!req->data_is_ptr && (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE)
+            && (req->size < sizeof(target_ulong))) {
+        req->data &= ((target_ulong) 1 << (8 * req->size)) - 1;
+    }
+}
+
 void xen_arch_handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req)
 {
     hw_error("Invalid ioreq type 0x%x\n", req->type);
diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
index f8a195270a..aff5c5b81d 100644
--- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
+++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
@@ -699,6 +699,14 @@ void xen_arch_set_memory(XenIOState *state, 
MemoryRegionSection *section,
     }
 }
 
+void xen_arch_align_ioreq_data(ioreq_t *req)
+{
+    if (!req->data_is_ptr && (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE)
+            && (req->size < sizeof(target_ulong))) {
+        req->data &= ((target_ulong) 1 << (8 * req->size)) - 1;
+    }
+}
+
 void xen_arch_handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req)
 {
     switch (req->type) {
diff --git a/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c b/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c
index c028c1b541..03f9417e7e 100644
--- a/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c
+++ b/hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c
@@ -426,10 +426,7 @@ static void handle_ioreq(XenIOState *state, ioreq_t *req)
     trace_handle_ioreq(req, req->type, req->dir, req->df, req->data_is_ptr,
                        req->addr, req->data, req->count, req->size);
 
-    if (!req->data_is_ptr && (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE) &&
-            (req->size < sizeof (target_ulong))) {
-        req->data &= ((target_ulong) 1 << (8 * req->size)) - 1;
-    }
+    xen_arch_align_ioreq_data(req);
 
     if (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE)
         trace_handle_ioreq_write(req, req->type, req->df, req->data_is_ptr,
-- 
2.41.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]