qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] target/arm: Introduce isar_feature_aa64_b


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] target/arm: Introduce isar_feature_aa64_bti
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:01:24 +0000

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 12:17, Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Also create field definitions for id_aa64pfr1 from ARMv8.5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 8512ca3552..fadb74d9a6 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,9 @@ FIELD(ID_AA64PFR0, GIC, 24, 4)
>  FIELD(ID_AA64PFR0, RAS, 28, 4)
>  FIELD(ID_AA64PFR0, SVE, 32, 4)
>
> +FIELD(ID_AA64PFR1, BT, 0, 4)
> +FIELD(ID_AA64PFR1, SBSS, 4, 4)

You could add
FIELD(ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 8, 4)
FIELD(ID_AA64PFR1, RAS_FRAC, 12, 4)

if you liked (from v8.5-MemTag and v8.4-RAS).

> +
>  FIELD(ID_AA64MMFR0, PARANGE, 0, 4)
>  FIELD(ID_AA64MMFR0, ASIDBITS, 4, 4)
>  FIELD(ID_AA64MMFR0, BIGEND, 8, 4)
> @@ -3268,6 +3271,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_lor(const 
> ARMISARegisters *id)
>      return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64mmfr1, ID_AA64MMFR1, LO) != 0;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_bti(const ARMISARegisters *id)
> +{
> +    return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, BT) != 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Forward to the above feature tests given an ARMCPU pointer.
>   */
> --
> 2.17.2

Either way,
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]