qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pcie: Add a simple PCIe ACS (Access Control


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pcie: Add a simple PCIe ACS (Access Control Services) helper function
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:32:58 -0700

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:14:07 +0100
Knut Omang <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 12:04 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:27:59 +0100
> > Knut Omang <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> > > Add a helper function to add PCIe capability for Access Control Services 
> > > (ACS)
> > > ACS support in the associated root port is a prerequisite to be able to 
> > > do useful
> > > passthrough with VFIO without Alex Williamson's pcie_acs_override kernel 
> > > patch.  
> > 
> > Define "useful".    
> 
> Hmm - just that without the patches, the root port itself 
> also gets assigned to the same group, which seemed problematic to me
> (without any further testing than just binding/unbinding to VFIO)

vfio-pci binding rules only apply to endpoints.  A root port lacking
ACS will include all devices downstream of it in the IOMMU group, and
potentially sibling functions, and devices downstream of those, but it
doesn't absolutely preclude L2 assignment, or L1 userspace usage,
which is already widely used.  It simply means that all the endpoints
within that group need to be bound to vfio-pci and can only have a
single owner.  Thanks,

Alex

> > We can certainly still assign single function PFs to
> > an L2 guest, or multi-function so long as all the functions are
> > assigned.  I won't deny that it's problematic, but it's a virtual
> > topology that can be adjusted, so I think this is overstating things a
> > bit.
> >   
> > > Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/pci/pcie.c              | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  include/hw/pci/pcie.h      |  1 +
> > >  include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h |  4 ++++
> > >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > index 230478f..18feff5 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > @@ -906,3 +906,17 @@ void pcie_ats_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset)
> > >  
> > >      pci_set_word(dev->wmask + dev->exp.ats_cap + PCI_ATS_CTRL, 0x800f);
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +/* Add an ACS (Access Control Services) capability */
> > > +void pcie_acs_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, uint8_t 
> > > egress_ctrl_vec_sz)
> > > +{
> > > +    int ectrl_words = (egress_ctrl_vec_sz + 31) & ~31;
> > > +    pcie_add_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS, PCI_ACS_VER,
> > > +                        offset, PCI_ACS_SIZEOF + ectrl_words);  
> > 
> > The egress control vector is only valid if the egress control
> > capability is enabled, which is not set below, so this just seems to
> > waste config space and introduces a meaningless function arg.
> >   
> > > +    pci_set_word(dev->config + offset + PCI_ACS_CAP,
> > > +                 PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_TB | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | 
> > > PCI_ACS_UF);  
> > 
> > Some of these bits are only valid for downstream ports, it would
> > violate the spec to set them on and endpoint.
> >   
> > > +    pci_set_word(dev->config + offset + PCI_ACS_CTRL,
> > > +                 PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_TB | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | 
> > > PCI_ACS_UF);  
> > 
> > The default values of the control register bits is zero, so we
> > shouldn't be setting it here and we should have a reset hook to clear
> > it.
> >   
> > > +    /* Make CTRL register writable */
> > > +    memset(dev->wmask + offset + PCI_ACS_CTRL, 0xff, 2);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > index 5b82a0d..c2da148 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie.h
> > > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ void pcie_add_capability(PCIDevice *dev,
> > >  void pcie_sync_bridge_lnk(PCIDevice *dev);
> > >  
> > >  void pcie_ari_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, uint16_t nextfn);
> > > +void pcie_acs_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, uint8_t 
> > > egress_ctrl_vec_sz);
> > >  void pcie_dev_ser_num_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset, uint64_t 
> > > ser_num);
> > >  void pcie_ats_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t offset);
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > index ad4e780..5e7409c 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > @@ -175,4 +175,8 @@ typedef enum PCIExpLinkWidth {
> > >                                           PCI_ERR_COR_INTERNAL |         \
> > >                                           PCI_ERR_COR_HL_OVERFLOW)
> > >  
> > > +/* ACS */
> > > +#define PCI_ACS_VER                      0x2
> > > +#define PCI_ACS_SIZEOF                  8
> > > +
> > >  #endif /* QEMU_PCIE_REGS_H */  
> >   
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]