Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice

[David Kiarie]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:32 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:27 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote:
>>> >
>>> >                             Hi David,
>>> >
>>> >                             On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote:
>>> >                             > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie
>>> >                             <address@hidden
>>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> >                             > ---
>>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
>>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +-
>>> >                             >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
>>> >                             deletions(-)
>>> >                             >
>>> >                             > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>> >                             b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>> >                             > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644
>>> >                             > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>> >                             > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>> >                             > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>> >                             >   * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi)
>>> >                             >   *
>>> >                             >   * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel
>>> >                             Munteanu
>>> >                             > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie,
>>> >                             <address@hidden
>>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> >                             > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie
>>> Kahurani
>>> >
>>> >                             Why do you change the year? Because your
>>> >                             work was merged in 2016?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                         no.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                     though, if you have a legitimate issue with the
>>> >                     change, you can always air it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >                 you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i
>>> >                 don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu repo
>>> >                 before this issue is sorted ;-)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >             i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i
>>> >             am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a routine),
>>> >             why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean
>>> >         Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this
>>> >     conversation, i'll be defacing qemu.
>>> >
>>> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like
>>> or
>>> > you have to take down - wtf
>>> >
>>> > then you try to cook rubbish over it.
>>>
>>> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will
>>> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the
>>> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a
>>> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did
>>> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again.
>>>
>>
>> i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your
>> codebase.
>>
>
>
> Qemu have never been important to me like it's important to the
> maintainers.
>
>
i'm sure you can write your own AMD IOMMU.


>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>  Thomas
>>>
>>