qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)

Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Hi Markus,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markus Armbruster 
>> >> >> > <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> >> >> Regardless, I *will* make time for ripping the feature out if we
>> >> >> >> decide to do that.  Quick & easy way to avoid reviewing this series
>> >> >> >> *hint* *hint*.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > well, fwiw, I would also take that approach too, to the risk of 
>> >> >> > upsetting
>> >> >> > the users.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object
>> >> >> first.
>> >> 
>> >> Daniel, do you object, yes or no?
>> >
>> > Yes, I object to removing the feature as it is clearly useful.
>> 
>> Thanks.  I sent v2 of my fixes.  Can you take care of getting them
>> merged, hopefully in time for 5.2?
>
> Sure, I'll aim to review & send PR today / tomorrow.

Excellent.  I'll be around to address whatever review comments you may
have.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]