[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi Markus,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markus Armbruster
>> >> >> > <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> >> >> Regardless, I *will* make time for ripping the feature out if we
>> >> >> >> decide to do that. Quick & easy way to avoid reviewing this series
>> >> >> >> *hint* *hint*.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > well, fwiw, I would also take that approach too, to the risk of
>> >> >> > upsetting
>> >> >> > the users.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object
>> >> >> first.
>> >>
>> >> Daniel, do you object, yes or no?
>> >
>> > Yes, I object to removing the feature as it is clearly useful.
>>
>> Thanks. I sent v2 of my fixes. Can you take care of getting them
>> merged, hopefully in time for 5.2?
>
> Sure, I'll aim to review & send PR today / tomorrow.
Excellent. I'll be around to address whatever review comments you may
have.