qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 0/9] qemu-ga-win patches


From: Konstantin Kostiuk
Subject: Re: [PULL 0/9] qemu-ga-win patches
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:37:39 +0200

Thanks for the information. I will read about the 'b4' tool.

Best Regards,
Konstantin Kostiuk.


On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:16 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 14:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/10/22 14:46, Konstantin Kostiuk wrote:
> > The following changes since commit df722e33d5da26ea8604500ca8f509245a0ea524:
> >
> >   Merge tag 'bsd-user-arm-pull-request' of gitlab.com:bsdimp/qemu into staging (2022-01-08 09:37:59 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   https://github.com/kostyanf14/qemu.git tags/qga-win32-pull-2022-01-10
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 206ce9699fae1f631ac74b7e1115db2affc759fd:
> >
> >   qga-win: Detect Windows 11 by build number (2022-01-10 13:05:25 +0000)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > qemu-ga-win patches
> >
> > * Fix memory leak in get_pci_info function
> > * Add support for Windows 11 in guest-get-osinfo command
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kostiantyn Kostiuk <kkostiuk@redhat.com>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I see the patch 'Message-ID' tag is not required on the guide:
> https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/submitting-a-pull-request.html
> but it is sometime useful.

I don't think we should be adding extra requirements if we don't
need them. The pullrequest handling infrastructure doesn't need
message-id tags.

thanks
-- PMM


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]