[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH-for-7.0 v4] target/i386/kvm: Free xsave_buf when destroyi
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH-for-7.0 v4] target/i386/kvm: Free xsave_buf when destroying vCPU |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:56:29 +0100 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:05:22 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>
> Fix vCPU hot-unplug related leak reported by Valgrind:
>
> ==132362== 4,096 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8,440
> of 8,549
> ==132362== at 0x4C3B15F: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:1265)
> ==132362== by 0x4C3B288: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:1429)
> ==132362== by 0xB41195: qemu_try_memalign (memalign.c:53)
> ==132362== by 0xB41204: qemu_memalign (memalign.c:73)
> ==132362== by 0x7131CB: kvm_init_xsave (kvm.c:1601)
> ==132362== by 0x7148ED: kvm_arch_init_vcpu (kvm.c:2031)
> ==132362== by 0x91D224: kvm_init_vcpu (kvm-all.c:516)
> ==132362== by 0x9242C9: kvm_vcpu_thread_fn (kvm-accel-ops.c:40)
> ==132362== by 0xB2EB26: qemu_thread_start (qemu-thread-posix.c:556)
> ==132362== by 0x7EB2159: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so)
> ==132362== by 0x9D45DD2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so)
>
> Reported-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> Based on a series from Mark:
> 20220321141409.3112932-1-mark.kanda@oracle.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220321141409.3112932-1-mark.kanda@oracle.com/
>
> RFC because currently no time to test
> ---
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index ef2c68a6f4..e93440e774 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -2072,6 +2072,8 @@ int kvm_arch_destroy_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
>
> + g_free(env->xsave_buf);
> +
> if (cpu->kvm_msr_buf) {
> g_free(cpu->kvm_msr_buf);
> cpu->kvm_msr_buf = NULL;
shouldn't we do the same in hvf_arch_vcpu_destroy() ?