qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] travis.yml: Add missing 'flex' package to 'GCC (user)' j


From: Vaibhav Jain
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] travis.yml: Add missing 'flex' package to 'GCC (user)' job
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 19:45:16 +0530

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for looking into this patch. My responses inline below:

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 14/04/2023 23.06, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> Since commit fd8171fe52b5e("target/hexagon: import lexer for idef-parser") 
>> the
>> hexagon target uses 'flex' to generate idef-parser. However 'focal' may not 
>> have
>> 'flex' pre-installed, consequently following error is seen with travis when
>> trying to execute the 'GCC (user)' job that also tries to build hexagon user
>> binary:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> export CONFIG="--disable-containers --disable-system"
>> <snip>
>>   Program flex found: NO
>> 
>> ../target/hexagon/meson.build:179:4: ERROR: Program 'flex' not found or not
>> executable
>> <snip>
>
> This works for me also without adding the package:
>
>   https://app.travis-ci.com/github/huth/qemu/jobs/600292739
>
> Weird. Are you using a different Travis instance than I do?
>
Yes, I am using a Enterprise Travis Instance with 'focal' distro which
apparantly has a different focal image not containing Flex available by
default.

>> Fix this by explicitly add 'flex' to the list of addon apt-packages for the
>> 'GCC (user)' job.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   .travis.yml | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>> index 11894eb810..8dc71c294d 100644
>> --- a/.travis.yml
>> +++ b/.travis.yml
>> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ jobs:
>>             - libglib2.0-dev
>>             - libgnutls28-dev
>>             - ninja-build
>> +          - flex
>
> I agree that adding this explicitely makes sense, but I think we should then 
> also add "bison" here as well, since that's used by the hexagon target, too?
Yes, agree. Will spinoff another version which explicitly adds this dep.

>   Thomas
>
>

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]