|
From: | Gavin Shan |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] machine: Print supported CPU models instead of typenames |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:16:18 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 |
On 7/27/23 09:08, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/25/23 17:32, Gavin Shan wrote:-static const char *q800_machine_valid_cpu_types[] = { +static const char * const q800_machine_valid_cpu_types[] = { M68K_CPU_TYPE_NAME("m68040"), NULL }; +static const char * const q800_machine_valid_cpu_models[] = { + "m68040", + NULL +};I really don't like this replication.
Right, it's going to be lots of replications, but gives much flexibility. There are 21 targets and we don't have fixed pattern for the mapping between CPU model name and CPU typename. I'm summarizing the used patterns like below. 1 All CPU model names are mappinged to fixed CPU typename; 2 CPU model name is same to CPU typename; 3 CPU model name is alias to CPU typename; 4 CPU model name is prefix of CPU typename; Target Categories suffix-of-CPU-typename ------------------------------------------------------- alpha -234 -alpha-cpu arm ---4 -arm-cpu avr -2-- cris --34 -cris-cpu hexagon ---4 -hexagon-cpu hppa 1--- i386 ---4 -i386-cpu loongarch -2-4 -loongarch-cpu m68k ---4 -m68k-cpu microblaze 1--- mips ---4 -mips64-cpu -mips-cpu nios2 1--- openrisc ---4 -or1k-cpu ppc --34 -powerpc64-cpu -powerpc-cpu riscv ---4 -riscv-cpu rx -2-4 -rx-cpu s390x ---4 -s390x-cpu sh4 --34 -superh-cpu sparc -2-- tricore ---4 -tricore-cpu xtensa ---4 -xtensa-cpu There are several options as below. Please let me know which one or something else is the best. (a) Keep what we have and use mc->valid_{cpu_types, cpu_models}[] to track the valid CPU typenames and CPU model names. (b) Introduce CPUClass::model_name_by_typename(). Every target has their own implementation to convert CPU typename to CPU model name. The CPU model name is parsed from mc->valid_cpu_types[i]. char *CPUClass::model_by_typename(const char *typename); (c) As we discussed before, use mc->valid_cpu_type_suffix and mc->valid_cpu_models because the CPU type check is currently needed by target arm/m68k/riscv where we do have fixed pattern to convert CPU model names to CPU typenames. The CPU typename is comprised of CPU model name and suffix. However, it won't be working when the CPU type check is required by other target where we have patterns other than this. Thanks, Gavin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |