qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu PATCH v2 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representat


From: Jørgen Hansen
Subject: Re: [Qemu PATCH v2 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representative and get DC extent list mailbox support
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:12:45 +0000

On 7/25/23 20:39, Fan Ni wrote:
> From: Fan Ni <nifan@outlook.com>
> 
> Add dynamic capacity extent list representative to the definition of
> CXLType3Dev and add get DC extent list mailbox command per
> CXL.spec.3.0:.8.2.9.8.9.2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> ---
>   hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   hw/mem/cxl_type3.c          |  1 +
>   include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 23 ++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> index 0511b8e6f7..3d25a9697e 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ enum {
>           #define CLEAR_POISON           0x2
>       DCD_CONFIG  = 0x48, /*r3.0: 8.2.9.8.9*/
>           #define GET_DC_CONFIG          0x0
> +        #define GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST   0x1
>       PHYSICAL_SWITCH = 0x51
>           #define IDENTIFY_SWITCH_DEVICE      0x0
>   };
> @@ -1018,6 +1019,73 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config(struct 
> cxl_cmd *cmd,
>       return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>   }
> 
> +/*
> + * cxl spec 3.0: 8.2.9.8.9.2
> + * Get Dynamic Capacity Extent List (Opcode 4810h)
> + */
> +static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> +        CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate,
> +        uint16_t *len)
> +{
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl {
> +        uint32_t extent_cnt;
> +        uint32_t start_extent_id;
> +    } QEMU_PACKED;
> +
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl {
> +        uint32_t count;
> +        uint32_t total_extents;
> +        uint32_t generation_num;
> +        uint8_t rsvd[4];
> +        CXLDCExtent_raw records[];
> +    } QEMU_PACKED;
> +
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl *in = (void *)cmd->payload;
> +    struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl *out = (void *)cmd->payload;
> +    struct CXLType3Dev *ct3d = container_of(cxl_dstate, CXLType3Dev,
> +            cxl_dstate);
> +    uint16_t record_count = 0, i = 0, record_done = 0;
> +    CXLDCDExtentList *extent_list = &ct3d->dc.extents;
> +    CXLDCD_Extent *ent;
> +    uint16_t out_pl_len;
> +    uint32_t start_extent_id = in->start_extent_id;
> +
> +    if (start_extent_id > ct3d->dc.total_extent_count) {
> +        return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> +    }
> +
> +    record_count = MIN(in->extent_cnt,
> +            ct3d->dc.total_extent_count - start_extent_id);
> +
> +    out_pl_len = sizeof(*out) + record_count * sizeof(out->records[0]);
> +    /* May need more processing here in the future */
> +    assert(out_pl_len <= CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE);
> +
> +    memset(out, 0, out_pl_len);
> +    stl_le_p(&out->count, record_count);
> +    stl_le_p(&out->total_extents, ct3d->dc.total_extent_count);
> +    stl_le_p(&out->generation_num, ct3d->dc.ext_list_gen_seq);
> +
> +    if (record_count > 0) {
> +        QTAILQ_FOREACH(ent, extent_list, node) {
> +            if (i++ < start_extent_id) {
> +                continue;
> +            }
> +            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].start_dpa, ent->start_dpa);
> +            stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].len, ent->len);
> +            memcpy(&out->records[record_done].tag, ent->tag, 0x10);
> +            stw_le_p(&out->records[record_done].shared_seq, ent->shared_seq);
> +            record_done++;
> +            if (record_done == record_count) {
> +                break;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    *len = out_pl_len;
> +    return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
>   #define IMMEDIATE_CONFIG_CHANGE (1 << 1)
>   #define IMMEDIATE_DATA_CHANGE (1 << 2)
>   #define IMMEDIATE_POLICY_CHANGE (1 << 3)
> @@ -1058,6 +1126,9 @@ static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {
>           cmd_media_clear_poison, 72, 0 },
>       [DCD_CONFIG][GET_DC_CONFIG] = { "DCD_GET_DC_CONFIG",
>           cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config, 2, 0 },
> +    [DCD_CONFIG][GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST] = {
> +        "DCD_GET_DYNAMIC_CAPACITY_EXTENT_LIST", cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list,
> +        8, 0 },
>   };
> 
>   static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_sw[256][256] = {
> diff --git a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> index 76bbd9f785..f1170b8047 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> @@ -789,6 +789,7 @@ static int cxl_create_dc_regions(CXLType3Dev *ct3d)
> 
>           region_base += region->len;
>       }
> +    QTAILQ_INIT(&ct3d->dc.extents);
> 
>       return 0;
>   }
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index 1c99b05a66..3a338b3b37 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -385,6 +385,25 @@ typedef QLIST_HEAD(, CXLPoison) CXLPoisonList;
> 
>   #define DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM 8
> 
> +typedef struct CXLDCD_Extent_raw {
> +    uint64_t start_dpa;
> +    uint64_t len;
> +    uint8_t tag[0x10];
> +    uint16_t shared_seq;
> +    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
> +} QEMU_PACKED CXLDCExtent_raw;
> +
> +typedef struct CXLDCD_Extent {
> +    uint64_t start_dpa;
> +    uint64_t len;
> +    uint8_t tag[0x10];
> +    uint16_t shared_seq;
> +    uint8_t rsvd[0x6];
> +
> +    QTAILQ_ENTRY(CXLDCD_Extent) node;
> +} CXLDCD_Extent;
> +typedef QTAILQ_HEAD(, CXLDCD_Extent) CXLDCDExtentList;
> +
>   typedef struct CXLDCD_Region {
>       uint64_t base;
>       uint64_t decode_len; /* in multiples of 256MB */
> @@ -433,6 +452,10 @@ struct CXLType3Dev {
> 
>           uint8_t num_regions; /* 0-8 regions */
>           struct CXLDCD_Region regions[DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM];
> +        CXLDCDExtentList extents;
> +
> +        uint32_t total_extent_count;

Hi,

I don't see total_extent_count being updated anywhere. Shouldn't this be 
adjusted as part of cmd_dcd_add_dyn_cap_rsp()/cmd_dcd_release_dyn_cap()?

Thanks,
Jorgen


> +        uint32_t ext_list_gen_seq;
>       } dc;
>   };
> 
> --
> 2.25.1

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]