Re: [PATCH 0/3] hvf x86 correctness and efficiency improvements

[Paolo Bonzini]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 PM Phil Dennis-Jordan <lists@philjordan.eu> wrote:
> > I think fd and the HVF type should be placed in an anonymous union.
>
> Taking a look at the code and thinking through the implications, I'm
> not actually sure what the intention of the union is

Nevermind, I got confused that AccelCPUState depends on what the
actual accelerator is. So yeah, you can just change the type of "fd";
it was an int only because in the past the field was defined for all
accelerators.

Paolo