qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v8 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:45:45 +0000

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 09:37, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Support ALLINT msr access as follow:
>         mrs <xt>, ALLINT        // read allint
>         msr ALLINT, <xt>        // write allint with imm
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v5:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> v4:
> - Remove arm_is_el2_enabled() check in allint_check().
> - Change to env->pstate instead of env->allint.
> v3:
> - Remove EL0 check in aa64_allint_access() which alreay checks in .access
>   PL1_RW.
> - Use arm_hcrx_el2_eff() in aa64_allint_access() instead of 
> env->cp15.hcrx_el2.
> - Make ALLINT msr access function controlled by aa64_nmi.
> ---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

If you configure with --target-list=aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu
you'll find this fails to build:

>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index b19a0178ce..aa0151c775 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -4752,6 +4752,36 @@ static void aa64_daif_write(CPUARMState *env, const 
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>      env->daif = value & PSTATE_DAIF;
>  }
>
> +static void aa64_allint_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
> +                              uint64_t value)
> +{
> +    env->pstate = (env->pstate & ~PSTATE_ALLINT) | (value & PSTATE_ALLINT);
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t aa64_allint_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
> +{
> +    return env->pstate & PSTATE_ALLINT;
> +}
> +
> +static CPAccessResult aa64_allint_access(CPUARMState *env,
> +                                         const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, bool isread)
> +{
> +    if (arm_current_el(env) == 1 && (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_TALLINT)) {
> +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2;
> +    }
> +    return CP_ACCESS_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static const ARMCPRegInfo nmi_reginfo[] = {
> +    { .name = "ALLINT", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0, .crn = 4, .crm = 3,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_NO_RAW,
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = aa64_allint_access,
> +      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, pstate),
> +      .writefn = aa64_allint_write, .readfn = aa64_allint_read,
> +      .resetfn = arm_cp_reset_ignore },
> +};

These functions and the array have been put in a bit of the
file that is built whether TARGET_AARCH64 is defined or not...

> +
>  static uint64_t aa64_pan_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>  {
>      return env->pstate & PSTATE_PAN;
> @@ -9889,6 +9919,10 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
>      if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nv2, cpu)) {
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nv2_reginfo);
>      }
> +
> +    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
> +        define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nmi_reginfo);
> +    }
>  #endif

...but the only reference to them is inside an ifdef TARGET_AARCH64.

Moving the nmi_reginfo[] and the functions so they are next to
some other TARGET_AARCH64-only reginfo array inside one of the
existing ifdef blocks is probably the nicest fix.

>
>      if (cpu_isar_feature(any_predinv, cpu)) {
> --

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]