qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] esp.c: don't assert() if FIFO empty when executing


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] esp.c: don't assert() if FIFO empty when executing non-DMA SELATNS
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:57:00 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 25/03/2024 10:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:

On 24/3/24 20:16, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
The current logic assumes that at least 1 byte is present in the FIFO when
executing a non-DMA SELATNS command, but this may not be the case if the
guest executes an invalid ESP command sequence.

What is real hardware behavior here?

I don't know for sure, but my guess is that if you ask to transfer a single byte from the FIFO to the SCSI bus and the FIFO is empty, you'll either end up with all zeros or a NOOP.

Reported-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
  hw/scsi/esp.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/esp.c b/hw/scsi/esp.c
index 1aac8f5564..f3aa5364cf 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/esp.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/esp.c
@@ -762,7 +762,8 @@ static void esp_do_nodma(ESPState *s)
          case CMD_SELATNS:

Alternatively logging the guest abuse:

               len = fifo8_num_used(&s->fifo);
               if (len < 1) {
                   qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, ...
                   break;
               }

              /* Copy one byte from FIFO into cmdfifo */
-            len = esp_fifo_pop_buf(s, buf, 1);
+            len = esp_fifo_pop_buf(s, buf,
+                                   MIN(fifo8_num_used(&s->fifo), 1));

This is similar to your previous comment in that it's an artifact of the implementation: when popping data using esp_fifo_pop_buf() I've always allowed the internal Fifo8 assert() if too much data is requested. This was a deliberate design choice that allowed me to catch several memory issues when working on the ESP emulation: it just so happened I missed a case in the last big ESP rework that was found by fuzzing.

It's also worth noting that it's a Fifo8 internal protective assert() that fires here which is different from the previous case whereby an overflow of the internal Fifo8 data buffer actually did occur.

              len = MIN(fifo8_num_free(&s->cmdfifo), len);
              fifo8_push_all(&s->cmdfifo, buf, len);


ATB,

Mark.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]