[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 19/23] spapr: CPU hot unplug support
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 19/23] spapr: CPU hot unplug support |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:44:48 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 07:06:00PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Support hot removal of CPU for sPAPR guests by sending the hot
> unplug notification to the guest via EPOW interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 78
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> target-ppc/kvm.c | 7 +++++
> target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 6 ++++
> 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index b48994b..7b8784d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1468,6 +1468,12 @@ static void spapr_cpu_init(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> qemu_register_reset(spapr_cpu_reset, cpu);
> }
>
> +static void spapr_cpu_destroy(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> +{
> + xics_cpu_destroy(spapr->icp, cpu);
> + qemu_unregister_reset(spapr_cpu_reset, cpu);
> +}
> +
> /* pSeries LPAR / sPAPR hardware init */
> static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> @@ -1880,6 +1886,18 @@ static void spapr_cpu_hotplug_add(DeviceState *dev,
> CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
> }
> }
>
> +static void spapr_cpu_hotplug_remove(DeviceState *dev, CPUState *cs,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> + int id = ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id(cpu);
> + sPAPRDRConnector *drc =
> + spapr_dr_connector_by_id(SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, id);
> + sPAPRDRConnectorClass *drck = SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_GET_CLASS(drc);
> +
> + drck->detach(drc, dev, NULL, NULL, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void spapr_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> {
> @@ -1911,6 +1929,51 @@ static void spapr_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler
> *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> return;
> }
>
> +static int spapr_cpu_unplug(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> +{
> + Error **errp = opaque;
> + DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> + CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> + int id = ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id(cpu);
> + int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> + sPAPRDRConnector *drc =
> + spapr_dr_connector_by_id(SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, id);
> +
> + spapr_cpu_destroy(cpu);
I may be misunderstanding something here, but don't you need to signal
the removal to the guest (and get its ack) before you "physically"
remove the cpu?
> + /*
> + * SMT threads return from here, only main thread (core) will
> + * continue and signal hot unplug event to the guest.
> + */
> + if ((id % smt) != 0) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + g_assert(drc);
> +
> + spapr_cpu_hotplug_remove(dev, cs, errp);
> + if (*errp) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> + spapr_hotplug_req_remove_event(drc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_cpu_core_unplug(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> +{
> + Error **errp = opaque;
> +
> + object_child_foreach(obj, spapr_cpu_unplug, errp);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_socket_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> + DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + object_child_foreach(OBJECT(dev), spapr_cpu_core_unplug, errp);
> +}
> +
> static void spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> @@ -1926,10 +1989,21 @@ static void spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler
> *hotplug_dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static void spapr_machine_device_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> + DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU_SOCKET)) {
> + if (dev->hotplugged && spapr->dr_cpu_enabled) {
> + spapr_cpu_socket_unplug(hotplug_dev, dev, errp);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static HotplugHandler *spapr_get_hotpug_handler(MachineState *machine,
> DeviceState *dev)
> {
> - if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU)) {
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU) ||
> + object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU_SOCKET)) {
> return HOTPLUG_HANDLER(machine);
> }
> return NULL;
> @@ -1953,6 +2027,8 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
> void *data)
> mc->has_dynamic_sysbus = true;
> mc->get_hotplug_handler = spapr_get_hotpug_handler;
> hc->plug = spapr_machine_device_plug;
> + hc->unplug = spapr_machine_device_unplug;
> +
> smc->dr_phb_enabled = false;
> smc->dr_cpu_enabled = false;
> smc->dr_lmb_enabled = false;
> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> index 12045a1..0c1be07 100644
> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
> #define KVM_CAP_PPC_FIXUP_HCALL 103
> #define KVM_CAP_PPC_ENABLE_HCALL 104
> #define KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM 105
> +#define KVM_CAP_SPAPR_REUSE_VCPU 107
Updates to linux-headers/ are usually put into their own patch for
safety (along with an indication of what kernel commit the additions
came from).
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> index 1edf2b5..ee23bf6 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static int cap_ppc_watchdog;
> static int cap_papr;
> static int cap_htab_fd;
> static int cap_fixup_hcalls;
> +static int cap_spapr_reuse_vcpu;
AFAICT nothing in this patch checks this variable. Does it belong in
this patch?
> static uint32_t debug_inst_opcode;
>
> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s)
> * only activated after this by kvmppc_set_papr() */
> cap_htab_fd = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTAB_FD);
> cap_fixup_hcalls = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_FIXUP_HCALL);
> + cap_spapr_reuse_vcpu = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SPAPR_REUSE_VCPU);
>
> if (!cap_interrupt_level) {
> fprintf(stderr, "KVM: Couldn't find level irq capability. Expect the
> "
> @@ -2408,3 +2410,8 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct
> kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +bool kvmppc_spapr_reuse_vcpu(void)
> +{
> + return cap_spapr_reuse_vcpu;
> +}
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> index 2e0224c..c831229 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void *kvmppc_create_spapr_tce(uint32_t liobn, uint32_t
> window_size, int *pfd,
> int kvmppc_remove_spapr_tce(void *table, int pfd, uint32_t window_size);
> int kvmppc_reset_htab(int shift_hint);
> uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size, unsigned int hash_shift);
> +bool kvmppc_spapr_reuse_vcpu(void);
> #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
> bool kvmppc_has_cap_epr(void);
> int kvmppc_define_rtas_kernel_token(uint32_t token, const char *function);
> @@ -185,6 +186,11 @@ static inline int kvmppc_update_sdr1(CPUPPCState *env)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvmppc_spapr_reuse_vcpu(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>
> static inline bool kvmppc_has_cap_epr(void)
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
pgp7KNcvjiLqZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 15/23] ppc: Move cpu_exec_init() call to realize function, (continued)
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 18/23] xics_kvm: Add cpu_destroy method to XICS, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 19/23] spapr: CPU hot unplug support, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 19/23] spapr: CPU hot unplug support,
David Gibson <=
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 20/23] spapr: Remove vCPU objects after CPU hot unplug, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 21/23] spapr: Initialize hotplug memory address space, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 22/23] spapr: Support ibm, dynamic-reconfiguration-memory, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 23/23] spapr: Memory hotplug support, Bharata B Rao, 2015/03/23