[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code
From: |
Nikunj A Dadhania |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:32:45 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.17+27~gae47d61 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) |
David Gibson <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:18:01PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 03/27/2015 08:49 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> >Each hardware instance has a platform unique location code. The OF
>> >device tree that describes a part of a hardware entity must include
>> >the “ibm,loc-code” property with a value that represents the location
>> >code for that hardware entity.
>> >
>> >Introduce an hcall to populate ibm,loc-code.
>> >1) PCI passthru devices need to identify with its own ibm,loc-code
>> > available on the host.
>> >2) Emulated devices encode as following: qemu_<name>:<slot>.<fn>
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
> [snip]
>> >diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >index af71e8b..95157ac 100644
>> >--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >@@ -310,7 +310,10 @@ typedef struct sPAPREnvironment {
>> > #define KVMPPC_H_LOGICAL_MEMOP (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x1)
>> > /* Client Architecture support */
>> > #define KVMPPC_H_CAS (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x2)
>> >-#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_CAS
>> >+#define KVMPPC_H_RTAS_UPDATE (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x3)
>> >+#define KVMPPC_H_REPORT_MC_ERR (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x4)
>> >+#define KVMPPC_H_GET_LOC_CODE (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x5)
>> >+#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX KVMPPC_H_GET_LOC_CODE
>>
>>
>> Please add only relevant codes. And what happened to patches adding
>> H_RTAS_UPDATE and H_REPORT_MC_ERR?
>>
>> Also (it is probably a very stupid question but still :) ), why are all
>> these callbacks - hypercalls, not RTAS calls? The hypercalls are numbered in
>> sPAPR and we kind of stealing numbers from that space while we are
>> allocating RTAS tokens ourselves and have more freedom.
>
> Also, I thought the plan was to remove PCI device enumeration from
> SLOF and move it to qemu (since we need to partially do that for
> hotplug).
For me it was a short term plan. IMHO, this cant be done in short time.
> That removes the need for the hcall entirely.
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_
> _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/03/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, David Gibson, 2015/03/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code,
Nikunj A Dadhania <=
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/03/30
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/03/30
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/03/30
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] spapr: populate ibm,loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/03/30