[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix contr
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:53:21 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 07:04:38PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
You know I'm going to say it, right: needs a commit message.
What's a "plb-pcix", and what's an example of a 440 SoCs which has it.
This is basically a new device, so I'm pretty willing to merge for
2.11 with minimal review once rebased with the rest of the series.
Couple of comments below
[snip]
> +static void ppc440_pcix_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> +{
> + struct PPC440PCIXState *s = PPC440_PCIX_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
> + int i;
> +
> + memset(s->pom, 0, sizeof(s->pom));
> + memset(s->pim, 0, sizeof(s->pim));
Is it safe to just memset() the memory region objects within the
pim/pom arrays without cleaning them up? I'm guessing not..
> + for (i = 0; i < PPC440_PCIX_NR_PIMS; i++) {
> + s->pim[i].sa = 0xffffffff00000000ULL;
> + }
> + s->sts = 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* All pins from each slot are tied to a single board IRQ.
> + * This may need further refactoring for other boards. */
> +static int ppc440_pcix_map_irq(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num)
> +{
> + int slot = pci_dev->devfn >> 3;
> +
> + DPRINTF("%s: devfn %x irq %d -> %d\n", __func__,
> + pci_dev->devfn, irq_num, slot);
> +
> + return slot - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void ppc440_pcix_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level)
> +{
> + qemu_irq *pci_irqs = opaque;
> +
> + DPRINTF("%s: PCI irq %d\n", __func__, irq_num);
> + if (irq_num < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: PCI irq %d\n", __func__, irq_num);
Use report_error() please.
> + return;
> + }
> + qemu_set_irq(pci_irqs[irq_num], level);
> +}
> +
> +static AddressSpace *ppc440_pcix_set_iommu(PCIBus *b, void *opaque, int
> devfn)
> +{
> + PPC440PCIXState *s = opaque;
> +
> + return &s->bm_as;
> +}
> +
> +static int ppc440_pcix_initfn(SysBusDevice *dev)
> +{
> + PPC440PCIXState *s;
> + PCIHostState *h;
> + int i;
> +
> + h = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
> + s = PPC440_PCIX_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->irq); i++) {
> + sysbus_init_irq(dev, &s->irq[i]);
> + }
> +
> + memory_region_init(&s->busmem, OBJECT(dev), "pci bus memory",
> UINT64_MAX);
> + h->bus = pci_register_bus(DEVICE(dev), NULL, ppc440_pcix_set_irq,
> + ppc440_pcix_map_irq, s->irq, &s->busmem,
> + get_system_io(), PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), 4, TYPE_PCI_BUS);
> +
> + s->dev = pci_create_simple(h->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0),
> "ppc4xx-host-bridge");
> +
> + memory_region_init(&s->bm, OBJECT(s), "bm-ppc440-pcix", UINT64_MAX);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(&s->bm, 0x0, &s->busmem);
> + address_space_init(&s->bm_as, &s->bm, "pci-bm");
> + pci_setup_iommu(h->bus, ppc440_pcix_set_iommu, s);
> +
> + memory_region_init(&s->container, OBJECT(s), "pci-container",
> PCI_ALL_SIZE);
> + memory_region_init_io(&h->conf_mem, OBJECT(s), &pci_host_conf_le_ops, h,
> + "pci-conf-idx", 4);
> + memory_region_init_io(&h->data_mem, OBJECT(s), &pci_host_data_le_ops, h,
> + "pci-conf-data", 4);
> + memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, OBJECT(s), &pci_reg_ops, s,
> + "pci.reg", PPC440_REG_SIZE);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, PCIC0_CFGADDR, &h->conf_mem);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, PCIC0_CFGDATA, &h->data_mem);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, PPC440_REG_BASE, &s->iomem);
> + sysbus_init_mmio(dev, &s->container);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ppc440_pcix_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> +{
> + SysBusDeviceClass *k = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> +
> + k->init = ppc440_pcix_initfn;
> + dc->reset = ppc440_pcix_reset;
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo ppc440_pcix_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_PPC440_PCIX_HOST_BRIDGE,
> + .parent = TYPE_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(PPC440PCIXState),
> + .class_init = ppc440_pcix_class_init,
> +};
> +
> +static void ppc440_pcix_register_types(void)
> +{
> + type_register_static(&ppc440_pcix_info);
> +}
> +
> +type_init(ppc440_pcix_register_types)
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 08/12] hw/ide: Emulate SiI3112 SATA controller, (continued)
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 04/12] ehci: Add ppc4xx-ehci for the USB 2.0 controller in embedded PPC SoCs, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/13
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 02/12] ppc4xx: Make MAL emulation more generic, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/13
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 10/12] ppc: Add 460EX embedded CPU, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/13
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/13
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs,
David Gibson <=
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, luigi burdo, 2017/08/18
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/18
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, luigi burdo, 2017/08/18
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, François Revol, 2017/08/18
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 09/12] ppc440: Add emulation of plb-pcix controller found in some 440 SoCs, BALATON Zoltan, 2017/08/19