qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] spapr: Drop unused parameters f


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] spapr: Drop unused parameters from fdt building helper
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:53:16 +0100

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:43:44 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
> 
> On 1/30/19 1:43 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:42:16 +1100
> > Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> >> spapr_load_rtas() handles now RTAS address and size information in the FDT
> >> so drop them from spapr_build_fdt().
> >>
> >> While we are here, fix a small typo.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2cac78c12ade9 "pseries: Consolidate RTAS loading"  
> > 
> > One nit. The last rtas_* user in spapr_build_fdt() was removed by the
> > following hunk:
> > 
> > @@ -949,12 +966,6 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >          }
> >      }
> >  
> > -    /* RTAS */
> > -    ret = spapr_rtas_device_tree_setup(fdt, rtas_addr, rtas_size);
> > -    if (ret < 0) {
> > -        error_report("Couldn't set up RTAS device tree properties");
> > -    }
> > -
> >      /* cpus */
> >      spapr_populate_cpus_dt_node(fdt, spapr);
> >  
> > from commit:
> > 
> > 3f5dabceba24 "pseries: Consolidate construction of /rtas device tree node"  
> 
> Can you (or David if he agrees) add a line about since when/why it is no
> more required?
> 

Commit 3f5dabceba24 (first released in QEMU 2.10) simply moved the FDT code
for RTAS to some other function, leaving the rtas_addr and rtas_size arguments
unused in spapr_build_fdt(). This patch is a trivial cleanup really.

> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> >   
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> 
> >> ---
> >>  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 8 +++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> index a217c7f..fa12723 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> @@ -1225,9 +1225,7 @@ static void spapr_dt_hypervisor(sPAPRMachineState 
> >> *spapr, void *fdt)
> >>      }
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >> -                             hwaddr rtas_addr,
> >> -                             hwaddr rtas_size)
> >> +static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> >>  {
> >>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> >>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> >> @@ -1644,14 +1642,14 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(void)
> >>  
> >>      /*
> >>       * We place the device tree and RTAS just below either the top of the 
> >> RMA,
> >> -     * or just below 2GB, whichever is lowere, so that it can be
> >> +     * or just below 2GB, whichever is lower, so that it can be
> >>       * processed with 32-bit real mode code if necessary
> >>       */
> >>      rtas_limit = MIN(spapr->rma_size, RTAS_MAX_ADDR);
> >>      rtas_addr = rtas_limit - RTAS_MAX_SIZE;
> >>      fdt_addr = rtas_addr - FDT_MAX_SIZE;
> >>  
> >> -    fdt = spapr_build_fdt(spapr, rtas_addr, spapr->rtas_size);
> >> +    fdt = spapr_build_fdt(spapr);
> >>  
> >>      spapr_load_rtas(spapr, fdt, rtas_addr);
> >>    
> > 
> >   




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]