[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:02:45 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:56:28PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:56:10 +0200
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 01/10/2019 13:06, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:57:22 +0200
> > > Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >> When vCPUs are hotplugged, they are added to the QEMU CPU list before
> > >> being fully realized. This can crash the XIVE presenter because the
> > >> 'tctx' pointer is not necessarily initialized when looking for a
> > >> matching target.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ouch... :-\
> > >
> > >> These vCPUs are not valid targets for the presenter. Skip them.
> > >>
> > >
> > > This likely fixes this specific issue, but more generally, this
> > > seems to indicate that using CPU_FOREACH() is rather fragile.
> > >
> > > What about tracking XIVE TM contexts with a QLIST in xive.c ?
> >
> > This is a good idea.
> >
> > On HW, the thread interrupt contexts belong to the XIVE presenter
> > subengine. This is the logic doing the CAM line matching to find
> > a target for an event notification. So we should model the context
> > list below the XiveRouter in QEMU which models both router and
> > presenter subengines. We have done without a presenter model for
> > the moment and I don't think we will need to introduce one.
> >
> > This would be a nice improvements of my patchset adding support
> > for xive escalations and better support of multi chip systems.
> > I have introduced a PNV_CHIP_CPU_FOREACH in this patchset which
> > would become useless with a list of tctx under the XIVE interrupt
> > controller, XiveRouter, SpaprXive, PnvXive.
> >
>
> I agree. It makes more sense to have the list below the XiveRouter,
> rather than relying on CPU_FOREACH(), which looks a bit weird from
> a device emulation code perspective.
That does sound like a better idea long term. However, for now, I
think the NULL check is a reasonable way of fixing the real error
we're hitting, so I've applied the patch here.
Future cleanups to a different approach remain welcome, of course.
> > Next step would be to get rid of the tctx->cs pointer. In my latest
> > patches, it is only used to calculate the HW CAM line.
> >
> > There might be some consequences on the object hierarchy and it will
> > break migration.
> >
>
> This could break if the contexts were devices sitting in a bus, which
> isn't the case here. I'll try to come up with a proposal for spapr,
> and we can work out the changes on your recent XIVE series for pnv.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > C.
> >
> > >
> > > ================================================================================
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> > > index 6d38755f8459..89b9ef7f20b1 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/xive.h
> > > @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ typedef struct XiveTCTX {
> > > qemu_irq os_output;
> > >
> > > uint8_t regs[XIVE_TM_RING_COUNT * XIVE_TM_RING_SIZE];
> > > +
> > > + QTAILQ_ENTRY(XiveTCTX) next;
> > > } XiveTCTX;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > diff --git a/hw/intc/xive.c b/hw/intc/xive.c
> > > index b7417210d817..f7721c711041 100644
> > > --- a/hw/intc/xive.c
> > > +++ b/hw/intc/xive.c
> > > @@ -568,6 +568,8 @@ static void xive_tctx_reset(void *dev)
> > > ipb_to_pipr(tctx->regs[TM_QW3_HV_PHYS + TM_IPB]);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static QTAILQ_HEAD(, XiveTCTX) xive_tctx_list =
> > > QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(xive_tctx_list);
> > > +
> > > static void xive_tctx_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > {
> > > XiveTCTX *tctx = XIVE_TCTX(dev);
> > > @@ -609,10 +611,14 @@ static void xive_tctx_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> > > Error **errp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > qemu_register_reset(xive_tctx_reset, dev);
> > > + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&xive_tctx_list, tctx, next);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void xive_tctx_unrealize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > {
> > > + XiveTCTX *tctx = XIVE_TCTX(dev);
> > > +
> > > + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&xive_tctx_list, tctx, next);
> > > qemu_unregister_reset(xive_tctx_reset, dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1385,15 +1391,14 @@ static bool xive_presenter_match(XiveRouter
> > > *xrtr, uint8_t format,
> > > bool cam_ignore, uint8_t priority,
> > > uint32_t logic_serv, XiveTCTXMatch
> > > *match)
> > > {
> > > - CPUState *cs;
> > > + XiveTCTX *tctx;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * TODO (PowerNV): handle chip_id overwrite of block field for
> > > * hardwired CAM compares
> > > */
> > >
> > > - CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> > > - XiveTCTX *tctx = xive_router_get_tctx(xrtr, cs);
> > > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(tctx, &xive_tctx_list, next) {
> > > int ring;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > ================================================================================
> > >
> > >> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> > >> ---
> > >> hw/intc/xive.c | 8 ++++++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/intc/xive.c b/hw/intc/xive.c
> > >> index b7417210d817..29df06df1136 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/intc/xive.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/intc/xive.c
> > >> @@ -1396,6 +1396,14 @@ static bool xive_presenter_match(XiveRouter
> > >> *xrtr, uint8_t format,
> > >> XiveTCTX *tctx = xive_router_get_tctx(xrtr, cs);
> > >> int ring;
> > >>
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * Skip partially initialized vCPUs. This can happen when
> > >> + * vCPUs are hotplugged.
> > >> + */
> > >> + if (!tctx) {
> > >> + continue;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> /*
> > >> * HW checks that the CPU is enabled in the Physical Thread
> > >> * Enable Register (PTER).
> > >
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/10/01
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Greg Kurz, 2019/10/01
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/10/01
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Greg Kurz, 2019/10/01
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter,
David Gibson <=
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Greg Kurz, 2019/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, David Gibson, 2019/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] spapr/xive: skip partially initialized vCPUs in presenter, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/10/03