qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] curses: don't initialize curses when qemu is


From: Hitoshi Mitake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] curses: don't initialize curses when qemu is daemonized
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:28:04 +0900

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Hitoshi Mitake <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:38:30PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>>>> Current qemu initializes curses even if -daemonize option is
>>>> passed. This cause problem because shell prompt appears without
>>>> calling endwin().
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds new function, is_daemonized(), to OS dependent
>>>> code. With this function, curses_display_init() can check that qemu is
>>>> daemonized or not. If daemonized, curses_display_init() returns
>>>> immediately.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, -daemonize && -curses doesn't make sense. Users shouldn't
>>>> pass the arguments at the same time. But the problem is very painful
>>>> because Ctrl-C cannot be delivered to the terminal. So if this
>>>> approach isn't acceptable, -daemonize && -curses combination should be
>>>> treated as error.
>>>
>>> I think it makes sense to explicitly check that -daemonize is used with
>>> -nographic | -vnc | -spice.
>>
>> Yes. But -curses doesn't make sense when it is passed with -daemonize.
>>
>>>
>>> Making curses aware of daemonize seems strange and doesn't stop the same
>>> issue with SDL.
>>>
>>
>> What is the same issue with SDL?
>
> You are right, it's fine to have an SDL display when QEMU is daemonized.
>
> What bugged me about the patch is that ui/curses.c shouldn't know
> about daemonize.  It would be cleaner to check this before
> initializing the curses display.  An error could be printed instead of
> silently skipping curses initialization.
>
> Can you move the check to vl.c:main() so it calls is_daemonized() and
> exits with an error message?
>

I agree with moving is_daemonized() to main(). I'll include this change
in the next version.

But I'm worrying about the way of printing error message and exiting.
This may break scripts which execute qemu with -daemonize && -curses.

So I like the way of skipping initialization of curses silently.
It doesn't change the semantics of command line option of qemu.

I'd like to hear your comments.

Thanks,
Hitoshi



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]