qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] disas/i386.c: Add explicit braces round empty for


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] disas/i386.c: Add explicit braces round empty for-loop body
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:17:54 +0000

Add explicit braces round an empty for-loop body; this fits
QEMU style and is easier to read than an inconspicuous semicolon
at the end of the line. It also silences a clang warning:

disas/i386.c:4723:49: warning: for loop has empty body [-Wempty-body]
          for (i = 0; tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1]; i++);
                                                       ^
disas/i386.c:4723:49: note: put the semicolon on a separate line to silence 
this warning [-Wempty-body]

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
This is the only clang warning on MacOSX apart from the ones about
deprecated features in audio/coreaudio.c and ui/cocoa.m, which is why
I think it's worth zapping despite it being a style issue in one of the
bits of disassembler code we got from binutils and which aren't generally
in QEMU style.

checkpatch complains about the non-multiple-of-4 indent:
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (10, 10)
#27: FILE: disas/i386.c:4723:
+          for (i = 0; tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1]; i++) {
+          }

but I didn't see any value in reindenting the whole function just to
shut it up.

At some point in the 1.5 cycle maybe we could update the code to avoid
the deprecated MacOS functions and then we could enable warnings-are-errors
on MacOS too.

 disas/i386.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/disas/i386.c b/disas/i386.c
index 3b006b1..dbecf1f 100644
--- a/disas/i386.c
+++ b/disas/i386.c
@@ -4720,7 +4720,8 @@ print_operand_value (char *buf, size_t bufsize, int hex, 
bfd_vma disp)
          buf[0] = '0';
          buf[1] = 'x';
           snprintf_vma (tmp, sizeof(tmp), disp);
-         for (i = 0; tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1]; i++);
+          for (i = 0; tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1]; i++) {
+          }
           pstrcpy (buf + 2, bufsize - 2, tmp + i);
        }
       else
-- 
1.7.11.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]