qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] debugcon: fix some bugs when


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] debugcon: fix some bugs when DEBUG_DEBUGCON
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 00:42:43 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Icedove/17.0

27.05.2013 05:40, li guang wrote:
[]
>>> NACK. If you want to apply 1-3, okay. But please unqueue 4/4, it makes
>>> no sense as-is (just look at the stderr output to see what I mean) and
>>> it pretends that I suggested that!
>>
>> Actually I did just that, rebuild with DEBUG_DEBUGCON and looked
>> at the output, -- because I didn't know how it works.  And you're
>> right, it's not a good change ;)  But your email come before I was
>> able to reply.  Unqueued.
> 
> Hi, Michael

Hello.  Please excuse me for the long(ish) delay, I was out of the city
when you sent this email and when you pinged me on IRC.

> do you queued patch 1-3?
> if so, I will only send one patch for comments from Andreas,
> otherwise, I will refactor all patches.

Yes I queued your patches 1-3 but not 4.  It can be seen at
http://git.corpit.ru/?p=qemu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/trivial-patches-next

(I just rebased it again on top of current qemu/master, but your 3
patches are there).

Should I replace these 3 with the next set?

But as Gerd correctly say, maybe it's better to just get rid of
these stuff completely, or maybe, just maybe, replace it with
tracepoints.

Anyway, I think the 3 queued-up patches are okay.

Thanks,

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]