qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gtk: implement -full-screen and


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gtk: implement -full-screen and -no-frame
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:15:17 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 10.06.2013 um 14:43 hat Peter Wu geschrieben:
> On Monday 10 June 2013 14:33:28 Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 09.06.2013 um 12:30 hat Peter Wu geschrieben:
> > > --- a/include/ui/console.h
> > > +++ b/include/ui/console.h
> > > @@ -339,6 +339,6 @@ int index_from_keycode(int code);
> > >
> > >  
> > >  /* gtk.c */
> > >  void early_gtk_display_init(void);
> > >
> > > -void gtk_display_init(DisplayState *ds);
> > > +void gtk_display_init(DisplayState *ds, int full_screen, int no_frame);
> > 
> > Should the new arguments be bool?
> 
> Probably yes, but for consistency with the existing types I kept it as int. A 
> future patch could change all uses of "int" to "bool" where 1 or 0 are used, 
> do you prefer to use bool here anyway?

Yes, if you have to respin anyway, I would prefer if you changed it to
bool. I mean it's not a big deal, but it moves us one step closer to
consistent use of bool for boolean values, so it can't be bad.

I don't think we'll ever see one big conversion patch, but as the code
is touched over time, ints abused as bools will slowly disappear if we
don't introduce new instances.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]