qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/29] tests/tcg: use ARRAY_SIZE


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/29] tests/tcg: use ARRAY_SIZE macro
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:16:25 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.50.3

Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Applied using the Coccinelle semantic patch 
>> scripts/coccinelle/use_osdep.cocci
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  tests/tcg/alpha/test-cond.c | 2 +-
>>  tests/tcg/alpha/test-ovf.c  | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I think those do not include osdep.h
>
> (sigh, tests/tcg would need some love ;)

Pranith has had a couple of revs at this:

  Subject: [PATCH v5 00/19] Cleanup of TCG tests
  Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2016 00:14:14 -0500
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>

We have the cross-compilers available as a fallback via docker although
not every one can seamlessly use it for building stuff. Is getting a
working cross-compiler setup too much of a hurdle fore those that want
to build cross-arch tests?

>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/alpha/test-cond.c b/tests/tcg/alpha/test-cond.c
>> index 74adffaa69..e5596f10b8 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/alpha/test-cond.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/alpha/test-cond.c
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int main (void)
>>  {
>>    int i;
>>
>> -  for (i = 0; i < sizeof (vectors)/sizeof(vectors[0]); i++)
>> +  for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vectors); i++)
>>      if ((*vectors[i].func)(vectors[i].v) != vectors[i].r) {
>>        write(1, "Failed\n", 7);
>>        return 1;
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/alpha/test-ovf.c b/tests/tcg/alpha/test-ovf.c
>> index 01c80e7525..43fc6ebb2e 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/alpha/test-ovf.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/alpha/test-ovf.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int main (void)
>>  {
>>    int i;
>>
>> -  for (i = 0; i < sizeof (vectors)/sizeof(vectors[0]); i++)
>> +  for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vectors); i++)
>>      if ((*vectors[i].func)(vectors[i].a, vectors[i].b) != vectors[i].r) {
>>        write(1, "Failed\n", 7);
>>      }
>> --
>> 2.13.2
>>
>>


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]