qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v2 10/12] MAINTAINERS: Orphanize the 'CPU (QOM


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v2 10/12] MAINTAINERS: Orphanize the 'CPU (QOM)' subsystem
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:57:31 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-12-18 16:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Paolo, Eduardo,
> > 
> > On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as orphan.
> >>>>
> >>>> Remove the address@hidden entry because the list is always
> >>>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section.
> >>>>
> >>>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  MAINTAINERS | 3 +--
> >>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644
> >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported
> >>>>  F: scripts/coverity-model.c
> >>>>  
> >>>>  CPU
> >>>> -L: address@hidden
> >>>> -S: Supported
> >>>> +S: Orphan
> >>>>  F: qom/cpu.c
> >>>>  F: include/qom/cpu.h
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't think that's accurate.  Simply there's not much going on.  If
> >>> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do something
> >>> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me).
> > 
> > I followed Markus suggestion from
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.html:
> > 
> >   If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously,
> >   we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list),
> >   or downgrade to S: Orphan.
> 
> I agree with Markus and Philippe. Having "S: Supported" but no names
> available is just confusing. So either put a maintainer name in here, or
> downgrade to "Orphan".

I volunteer to maintain it, but I don't want to be the only
maintainer.  Any other volunteer?

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]