qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Flag suspicious a


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Flag suspicious attribution lines
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:29:14 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

On 2/4/19 11:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Flag commit attribution tags that are unusual (often because they
> were a typo), but only as a warning (because sometimes a humorous
> or otherwise useful tag is intentionally supplied).
> 
> This picks the 6-most popular tags, each with 700 or more uses (well,
> S-o-b was already checked for case-sensitivity and typos, leaving
> only 5 new tags being checked), as determined by:
> $ git log | sed -n 's/^ *\([A-Za-z-]*-by:\).*/\1/p' | \
>   sort | uniq -c | sort -k1,1n | tail
> 
> Most of the rejected lines were obvious typos (among others, we've
> had 4 cases of someone being burnt, based on Singed-off-by; and 2
> cases of list-reading via an e-reader, based on eviewed-by; there
> are also lines forgetting a space after the ':') or otherwise
> tongue-in-check (3 Approximately-suggested-by). A few lines not
> whitelisted here may be legitimate, but as they are orders of
> magnitude rarer, it is therefore not worth worrying about
> (7 Requested-by, 3 Co-authored-by, 1 Inspired-by, etc.).

'Inspired-by' is kinda Zen :) And is from Peter!

> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> v2: fix regex
> 
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 88682cb0a9f..4962f74eec1 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ sub process {
>                   ERROR("Author email address is mangled by the mailing 
> list\n" . $herecurr);
>               }
> 
> -#check the patch for a signoff:
> +#check the patch for a signoff, and that other attribution lines are typical:
>               if ($line =~ /^\s*signed-off-by:/i) {
>                       # This is a signoff, if ugly, so do not double report.
>                       $signoff++;
> @@ -1470,6 +1470,10 @@ sub process {
>                               ERROR("space required after Signed-off-by:\n" .
>                                       $herecurr);
>                       }
> +             } elsif($line =~ /^\s*([A-Za-z-]*)-by:/ &&

I guess we don't mind about angry typewriters who Ack-BY ;)

> +                     ($1 !~ /(Suggest|Report|Test|Ack|Review)ed/ ||
> +                      $line !~ /^\s*[a-z-]*-by:\s/i)) {

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

> +                 WARN("suspicious attribution tag:\n" . $herecurr);
>               }
> 
>  # Check if MAINTAINERS is being updated.  If so, there's probably no need to
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]