qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] CODING_STYLE: specify the in


From: Wei Yang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:04:18 +0000
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:52:29AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 2/18/19 7:31 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> We didn't specify the indent rule for multiline code here, which may
>> misleading users. And in current code, the code use different rules.
>> 
>> Add this rule in CODING_STYLE to make sure this is clear to every one.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
>> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  CODING_STYLE | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
>> index ec075dedc4..73f66ca185 100644
>> --- a/CODING_STYLE
>> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
>> @@ -29,6 +29,32 @@ Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
>>  
>>  Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
>>  
>> +1.1 Multiline Indent
>> +
>> +There are several places where indent is necessary:
>> +
>> + - struct definition
>> + - if/else
>> + - while/for
>> + - function definition & call
>> +
>> +All the above cases apply the same rule: indent with four spaces.
>
>Is this redundant with the earlier statement that "QEMU indents are four
>spaces."?
>
>> +
>> +While the last three case may face another situation: code should spread 
>> into
>> +several lines. In this case the rule is align the new line with first
>> +parentheses.
>
>Grammar is awkward - the leading 'while' makes it sound like that you
>have a dependent clause, but then never provide the independent clause.
>Maybe a completely different wording is better:
>
>When breaking up a long line to fit within line widths, align the
>secondary lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first.
>

Sounds better.

>> +
>> +For example:
>> +
>> +    if (a == 1 &&
>> +        b == 2)
>> +
>
>Maybe:
>
>if (a == 1 &&
>    b == 2) {
>
>to match our later recommendations on always using {}.
>

Yep.

>> +    while (a == 1 &&
>> +           b == 2)
>> +
>
>Similar.
>
>> +    do_something(arg1, arg2
>> +                 arg3)
>> +
>
>and here, I'd include the ';' to make it a valid statement.
>

Reasonable.

>>  2. Line width
>>  
>>  Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.
>> 
>
>-- 
>Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
>Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
>Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]