rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: [Duplicity-talk] Tar replacement - format p


From: Kevin Spicer
Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: [Duplicity-talk] Tar replacement - format proposal
Date: 27 Sep 2003 00:33:06 +0100

On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 23:40, Will Dyson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 16:35, Will Dyson wrote:
> 
> > I've written a filesystem driver for the Linux kernel (befs), although I
> 
> Thinking about befs made me realize there is one important thing missing
> from the proposal: Extended attributes.
> 
> Most extended attributes will be small and textual, and can be archived
> in the file index entry without trouble. However, nothing in the
> extended attribute interface mandates that attributes be small or
> textual. Some filesystems (such as befs, ntfs, and probably the upcoming
> reiser4 filesystem) efficiently support extended attributes that are
> arbitrarily large.
> 
> In fact, under BeOS, it is common to attach an image file's thumbnail as
> an extended attribute.

Hmmm, that sounds similar to the principle of multiple streams for a
single file in NTFS 




BMRB International 
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the 
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying 
or other action taken in respect of this email or in 
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited 
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or 
content of any email which does not directly relate to our 
business.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]