[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup and tapes
From: |
Yannick Patois |
Subject: |
[rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup and tapes |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:53:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Hi,
I would like to backup stuff on tapes. Until now, I was using rsync at
some location + some proprietary software to archive the content.
Problem is that this combination doesn't know about block increments
(only file increments).
If I replace rsync by rdiff-backup, I get block-aware backup in
rdiff-backup-data but also a full copy like rsync did.
So if I backup this on tape I didn't earn anything.
What would be nice would be that only rdiff-backup-data would have to be
backuped, as block increments are converted to files never touched
again. But it looks like it's not the case. If I understand it right the
"current directory" contains the latest version and previous ones can be
reconstructed by reading the blocks in the rdiff-backup-data directory.
Which means that I need the "current directory" archive backup which
ruins the whole idea.
I'm sure I'm not the only one to have this question as I saw a lot of
messages on the subject, but couldn't find any conclusion.
So, does someone have been able to use rdiff-backup to reduce "file
grained incremental backup" on tape to "block level incremental backups" ?
Thanks,
Yannick
--
_/ Yannick Patois _________________ Address (home) __________________
| irc(undernet): Garp on #france25+ | 4, rue du Scharrach |
| http://garp.feelingsurfer.net/ | 67200 Strasbourg |
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup and tapes,
Yannick Patois <=