savannah-hackers-public
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] my intro


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] my intro
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:01:31 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:56:47PM +0000, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:30:56PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:09:40PM +0000, Noah Slater wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:27:47PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > > We recommend using 'COPYING' but we do not have any hard requirement. 
> > > > As long
> > > > as the license is present in the top-level directory it's fine. I've 
> > > > seen
> > > > files such as 'LGPL' or 'BSD' too.
> > >
> > > Is it okay if COPYING is added by GNU Automake at packaging time but is
> > > absent from the actual source. I do not like keeping generated files in my
> > > repository and this is no exception.
> >
> > I think COPYING is exception in this case, essentially for the reasons
> > mentioned at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyMustIInclude
> 
> An exception? Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean.

I think COPYING is *no* exception in this case, essentially for the reasons
mentioned at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyMustIInclude

Sorry for the typo -_-'

-- 
Sylvain




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]