[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] RE: ForgePlucker
|
From: |
Karl Berry |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] RE: ForgePlucker |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:30:28 -0500 |
No, he includes the license in a COPYING file.
Well, that ameliorates the situation somewhat, although if he doesn't
unambiguously refer to that COPYING file, it's still pretty vague.
But if the requirement is a 100% valid copyright notice complying with
all the rules in precise detail, then clearly he does not meet that
standard.
I don't know where to go from here. Sorry.