[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Simulavr-devel] Re: Simulavrxx
From: |
Klaus Rudolph |
Subject: |
[Simulavr-devel] Re: Simulavrxx |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:03:44 +0200 (MEST) |
Hi Oleg,
> There is a small project (build some device) that my friend (Artur)
> makes, but he has some problem with atmel program. It seemes like stack
> overflow,
like the actual discussions in avr-gcc-list :-)
> but we are unable to figure it out. Decision was made about a
> week ago to try simulavrxx - try to make program that simulates external
> world. As we do not use TCL or Python I started to update build process,
> but Artur digs simulavrxx itself.
I could provide you a simple Makefile which compile and link all the
things you need whitout any external tools (g++ is required :-).
You also should find it on the list archive, because you are
not the first who ask for it.
>
> 1) Build process
> First I wanted to add some small changes, but it has come up with lot of
> changes. I still cannot solve some build problems, but now Im able to
> disable Tcl and Python.
see above
For any details about autotools related things, please wait for Bills
answers.
> 2) Simulavrxx itself
> a) Artur has found some bugs in USART classes and I'll write about them
> later (see CVS web below)
Please use actual CVS tree, we have fixed some bugs a few weeks ago.
> b) As we don't need UserInterface, but USART is the same, so he made
> SerialTxBasic class which holds transmission logic; SerialTx subclasses
> it and connects with UserInterface.
> c) We are thinking about simulavrxx design and how it can be improved,
> but not much to say yet. Were there any thoughts, Klaus?
If you could provide a design change which enables easier programming and!
faster execution, great! But speed and convinience are important for us :-)
>
> So, I don't know what do you think about these changes and if something
> is OK, how patches can be made.
Simple send small!!!! diff files with a describing mail. We will look
inside and apply the patch or maybe not. For add on it is not
a problem if the add on fits into existing design and coding.
If you want to change actual design, please lets have a discussion about
that first.
Regards,
Klaus
--
Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail gratis + 3 Ausgaben stern gratis
++ Jetzt anmelden & testen ++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail ++
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: Simulavrxx,
Klaus Rudolph <=