Re: [Sks-devel] An embarrassing question

[John Clizbe]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yaron Minsky wrote:
> This is an embarrassing question to ask about software that I wrote, but
> here it is.  I've been poking around with the sks code trying to get it
> to compile on a reasonably modern system, and having some real trouble
> getting it up.  I'm trying to build on a 64-bit centos 5 box using OCaml
> 3.10.2, and I'm wondering if anyone has run into the same problems I'm
> seeing.  When I try to build, I get the errors shown below.

A post showed up on GnuPG-Users yesterday:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-May/033395.html
He gave no other details than "Fedora 9 on an x86_64 box with 4 gigs of
ram and Numerix blows up on compile with "out of memory" errors"

In a reply, Todd Zullinger posted a patch that updates bdb from
4.1 to 4.6

I've been using a couple other patches and the 1.010 source tarball is
missing sks.pod.

Maybe it's time for a 1.0.11

- --
John P. Clizbe                   Inet: JPClizbe (a) tx DAWT rr DAHT con
Ginger Bear Networks             hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind."
                             - Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4754-2008-04-30 (Windows XP)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, b25seSBvdXRsYXdzIHdpbGwgdXNlIG
Comment: Be part of the £33t ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iJwEAQECAAYFAkgiaewACgkQvh+YERi7NzrZZAP/RfD66/G8e/MXfRqVHL6YzjsP
Us8ejrPi2DQwu/IWWzm7HHbhSb5uOS187j+0ki8x7utcC5znPpkwiIJ3aJBa+A2r
WoykmehU0I4PiasE9rZzOIczy+YcZYGAq2H/BGDtsrWvNzPClSQvsi4mAi446uj7
yiRqjPGqJ5xkD+vCHRaIRgQBEQIABgUCSCJp7AAKCRAdBKxKYI0qELVNAKDCHCzs
mN8lroBe86vBY1ey0kD1NwCg+xbtPHeLuJZoVosofjnL5v8RlJo=
=u4vY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----