[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR
From: |
Werner Koch |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:13:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 17:27, address@hidden said:
> I do roughly recal that such a verification process has been discussed for
> the SKS keyservers at one of the pgp-summit before, but i wonder what
> happened to the idea. However, if it that is “good enough” to be compliant
This requires that there are no rogue keyservers in the network and that
in turn means that they are under the control of a single entity. Or
in short, let Google take care of it.
Such verification will be a single point of failure and it would be
trivial for governments or corporations to take down a key.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
pgpvffhDYO3lK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Werner Koch, 2018/11/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Yegor Timoshenko, 2018/11/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Andrew Gallagher, 2018/11/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] [Autocrypt] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Tobias Mueller, 2018/11/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] [Autocrypt] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Werner Koch, 2018/11/07
- Re: [Sks-devel] [Autocrypt] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR, Mike, 2018/11/07
Re: [Sks-devel] [openpgp-email] Keyservers and GDPR,
Werner Koch <=