Re: [Xlog-discussion] RE: Hold your (xlog-) horses - suggestion

[Tomi Manninen]

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Stephane Fillod wrote:

> > I think we could live with making ':' an illegal character inside a
> > message. The sending program would have the resposibility for making sure
> 
> Actualy it doesn't matter if a ':' appear in the data field, as long as
> the *field name* does not allow the ':' character.

Ah, of course. Should have thought it a bit further...

> Would it be possible to not use '\n' instead of '\1' ? 
> Some psk31 programs may want to include carriage return in the comment
> field.

Sure. It's a simple #define in my code so I'll just leave it as it is 
currently.

-- 
Tomi Manninen           Internet:  address@hidden
OH2BNS                  AX.25:     address@hidden
KP20ME04                Amprnet:   address@hidden